Tuesday 2 March 2010

Keisha Buchanan Sues Sugababes!

Very late in posting this again! But I thought I would throw my two cents in and have a rave about this. Firstly, It seems as though Keisha Buchanan is suing the Sugababes over the name usage. As Keisha was very much involved in the creation of the band, and after being shoved out of the band last year, I only see this as being the fair thing to do.
I do not see Keisha as being a bitch or the bully that everyone makes out her to be, and I only see that she is standing up for her rights. Yeah, I think the Sugababes should change name, but it isn't a massive thing. I have no quarrels about the new Sugababes as I very much enjoyed their latest album 'Sweet 7'. Read my review to find out my thoughts.

I would like to hear your thoughts on this, so please comment and have a discussion!

'Sweet 7' Out 15th March!

3 Comments:

Anonymous said...

They should NOT change the name !!!
Heidi might not be the original member but she is a true member. I have followed the SUGABABES from day 1 (year 2000) am still a fan and have remained unbiased.
Heidi had the chance at a solo career from Siomon Cowell back in 2006 - but she never took it and WHY? because she is loyal and loves her babes and wants to work as a team - obviously not like the other previous three. Heidi could have easily became the nations sweetheart and a judge on X-Factor way before Mrs Cole!!! She had the chance.
The Sugababes were dropped by their record label back in 2001 and when Heidi joined they got a new deal and label, the hits that came were not just because of Heidi it was because of the three of them, and now the 2010 Sugababes are still strong.
I hope Keisha is exposed as the bully that she was / is, Heidi stayed strong and held her with contempt - a true British babe. Keisha was the one who slagged of Girls Aloud and Heidi put GA fans straight by saying they (Sugababes and girls aloud) are friends.
When news broke in September 2009 of Keisha’s departure did Heidi and Amelle spill the beans ? Did they have magazine deals after magazine deals - NO. They kept their cool and remained truly British - a form of character not seen before the advent of 21st century celebrities. By February 2010 that’s when new broke that is was Heidi and Amelle and the management who left - along with the name.


Good luck to the Sugababes.
OR by the way shall we rename Eastenders to something else when the last original actor (Ian Beale) leaves ????
HEIDI = STAR
AMELLE= STAR
JADE= STAR
SUGABABES FOREVER
Truth will out

24/7 Entertainment said...

You are entitled to your opinion. But I do not believe that Keisha is a bully. She has only been shown that way, just like Mutya was.
And if Heidi is so great why the heck did she stay with the Sugababes, she can't be that clever!
And the only reason I say they should change the name is because their musical style has completely changed and also because they are not the same anymore. I would not say any of them are stars, they are far from it. But they are no way indeed angels like you make them out to be.
And the comment about Eastenders is just plain stupid, it is a TV programme and cannot be compared to the likes of a band!
Nuff said!

Unknown said...

Hello there. I believe the music style changing was in plan since Keisha was there, so, in spite of change their patch in music, that was an original plan. Perhaps there are so much catfights about the Babes, we had known so much stories of rock bands that changed their acts and still remains with the name. Let`s give the refreshed babes a change.

Post a Comment